Showing posts with label Leadership. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Leadership. Show all posts
Saturday, October 3, 2015
What Is Pope Francis' Agenda?
It seems I have heard that subject question raised on many a
talk show in recent days, and on a goodly number of them even heard the answer
--- they think they know what is in the pope’s mind! I, for one, do not make such presumption ---
but I do believe I know what is in His heart.
The Bible study group this week focused on the many calls of
Jesus to the apostles, to the disciples, and to strangers who walked up to Him. He said:
Follow me. He asked them for a
commitment, a change in their lives, but I also noticed that, in almost all the
cases we looked at, He first spoke with them:
they had a conversation.
That point struck me as a key one, and my mind wandered to
the political affairs in Washington and to the cancer there which also seems to
inhabit the minds of the general public:
people don’t converse anymore.
Maybe it started with the breakdown of the family, or perhaps it was the
breakdown of faith. People may have felt
they no family they could trust, or perhaps no God they could trust, and so
they decided they could only trust themselves.
No conversation with others was needed.
It seems that much of what does pass as conversation on
complex matters these days is really not conversation --- a back and forth
discussion --- but rather it is like the “discussions” we see in Congress,
where person after person walks up to the microphone and gives a speech: “Hear me!
Did you hear what I said? Are you
convinced yet?”
That is not conversation.
And as Jesus and the Gospels demonstrate, conversion --- a changing of
minds and hearts --- is not something that is dictated, but rather it is
something which begins with conversation.
From conversation can flow trust, and from trust reasoned (together)
truth, and from truth the gift of
faith --- and it IS a gift. Conversion
and faith are not something we can force upon someone else.
What is Pope Francis’ agenda? Well, if he indeed does have one, some master
plan HE devised to convert people to his way of thinking, well then I strongly
suspect he will fail. Jesus demonstrated
that conversion and faith is a gift.
Even the pope can’t compel people’s conversion through some master plan
of his. The pope is a man with a
job. Like any other man he has opinions
and deep beliefs, many formed by his upbringing, and many formed in answer to
his prayers. He knows his job and what
it entails, and He prays that God will help him do it well. But as for his plan for success, I strongly
suggest and believe that He asks God to lead, according to His plan: “Not my will, but
Thy will be done in me, O Lord.”
And then the pope follows God’s inspirations and
example. And certainly the pope is aware
of Jesus’ example of not dictating doctrine or conversion. He didn’t order Caesar to feed the poor. He didn’t create shelves of bread in every
home so no one would starve. He didn’t even
demand everyone listen to Him. What He
did was go to them, wherever they were, and began a conversation.
If many people want to talk about global warming, I think
Pope Francis will talk to them. If they
want to talk about the rich or the poor, he will talk to them. He will go to talk to them, whether in
Congress or the United Nations. And from
his conversations may flow other things …
Is this part of his well-thought-out “agenda”? I think not.
I am not at all sure he has some complex detailed plan of action. This answer, however, almost begs another
question: Well then, does GOD have some
master plan? Here I am much more
confident that, yes, there is a plan, although surely it is beyond my reasoning
ability to fathom its depths. I think
the pope believes this also, and he goes forth without having to see the end
destination of his efforts in sight. He
trusts.
And so I will trust.
Jesus didn’t concern Himself with telling Caesar what to do, so neither
will I concern myself with telling the pope what to do.
And I will give to him what is proper and due, without
criticism or implication that: “I know better.”
Thursday, March 6, 2014
Why Won't He Listen to Me?
I was sitting outside as the priest opened the church doors
this morning, and I walked in with him as he went about turning on the lights. He commented on some of our prior discussions,
and thanked me for the recent book I had given him. A very busy priest, he had just read the
words I had underlined in the text, and got what I considered the important stuff.
He asked me “What’s new” in my life, and I described my idea
for supporting parish family life. “That
sounds like a very good idea,” he said. “Keep
me informed how that progresses,” and he walked away, continuing his mass setup
chores.
But the conversation went on in my mind, as I argued all the
reasons for my great idea, and all the wonderful things it might bring about
--- No; make that LIKELY would bring about.
This was an IMPORTANT idea.
But he didn’t hear my unsaid words. And I couldn’t quiet my mind as it raced
along on the topic. He had walked away, but
in my mind I thought: “Why won’t he listen to me? He acknowledged this was a good idea, didn’t
he?”
But then, sitting there in the quiet of the church, God
opened my old mind to another time and another good idea I once had, and the
man who HAD listened to me, and thanked me for my idea, and then rushed to
implement it. And I recalled how proud
that made me --- for a very short while.
I paid for my college education by clerking 8 hours a day on
the railroad. My starting job involved
walking through the yard and writing down boxcar numbers, and noting their
destinations. The rail yard acted as a
boxcar sorting point. Trains entered the
yard with boxcars destined for cities A through Z, blocked in groups of A
through E, F through L, etc. In our yard
we put together all the A-to-E cars from various inbound trains into one new outbound
train headed toward cities A to E, or other groups of cities. And we added a few on-hand cars destined for
A-to-E that we might have picked up from local companies. We did pretty much the same thing for the
other cities, and during my shift the newly blocked trains left the yard. It all seemed pretty simple and organized to
my bright, teen-aged mind.
And my mind WAS bright --- as everyone (and my school
grades) told me. There was a young black
man I knew, Art, who worked for the railroad at that time. Smart, he was a crew leader in the yard,
driving one of the engines that sorted the rail cars. I liked Art, and he invited me to dinner with
his young family a couple of times. I
didn’t think it unusual, but it was in those days of Dr. Martin Luther King
marches. And so it was a surprise when
Art was promoted to be the first black Yardmaster, supervisor of all engine
crews on my afternoon work shift. Art
and his family were so proud, and I was very happy for him.
I remember Art’s first day on his new job. As he was directing the train destined for cities
A-to-E to be formed, I noticed a few local cars for A-to-E and walked into Art’s
office. “Hey, here’s a few more,” I
said. “Thanks,” Art replied. “I’ll send an engine to get them.” And then I discovered a few more on another
track, and then the local industry pickup train came in, and I pointed out a
few more. And Art thanked me again, and
directed adding those cars also to the growing outbound A-to-E train.
As the afternoon passed, I thought: “We sure are a great
team, Art and I,” and I felt so proud of my contribution. But it was near the end of my shift when the
regional manager, Art’s boss, came into Art’s office. “What the *X$$#* is the A-to-E train still
doing in the yard?” he screamed. And
after Art explained our great efforts, the boss further exclaimed: “You
idiot!! Your delays have meant that the
A-to-E cars will miss the cutoff at the next sorting yard, where they now will
sit for an extra day --- and cost the railroad money!”
“You’re fired!!!” he screamed. And as I stood there in the office doorway,
he stormed out past me.
I was stunned, and couldn’t speak for a few minutes, as I
looked at the equally stunned Art. What
would he tell his family? Art had
listened to me and my great ideas …. “I’m so sorry, Art,” was all I could
say. “That’s all right,” he
responded. “It’s my fault; I should have
known better.” And he picked up his coat
and lunch pail and left the office.
I never saw Art or his family again. I’m not sure I ever even thought about him again;
I think at the time it was too painful.
I guess my shocked mind wouldn’t let me go there. And as wise as I thought myself to be, I can now
look back and see how stupid I was; what a stupid thing I had done, in my
pride.
It’s been a lot of years since I “helped” my friend, Art, get
fired. And in those intervening years
how many times have I thought the words I did this morning about a boss or a friend:
“I’ve got a great idea! Why won’t he
listen to me?”
How much pride I have had!
How often have you, too, had a great idea, but your wife or
your kids or your priest or your boss or your Church or your company or your
government wouldn’t listen? We all have
so many great ideas, don’t we? We all
have such great pride. “Why won’t they
listen to me?”
Art did.
It was only a short parable, but I think it an important
one, which ended with the words: “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s.” I think perhaps at that time Jesus’ followers
didn’t understand this message; it is a hard one to accept. Caesar was ruler for the Empire, and
responsible for it. Jesus’ followers
might have looked at Him and thought: “But you know so much more than Caesar; You
could find better uses for that money; You could be fairer than Caesar’s taxes.” And looking at all Jesus wanted to
accomplish, certainly they were right.
He could better accomplish what he wished to accomplish. But that was not what Caesar wished to
accomplish, because that was not what Caesar was OBLIGATED to accomplish. Caesar was obligated to rule the Empire as
best as he could; Jesus was obligated to save souls as best He could. So Jesus said “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s”
so that he can do what he should --- and if he then fails in his obligations,
he shall answer for it. But Caesar is
obligated to do many things, even beyond the immediate focus of Jesus. In His words to His followers, Jesus was
telling them that they were not obligated, indeed they should not interfere,
with tasks which were not theirs. And
they should trust others, even if perhaps they thought they could do better
than they. Unless they had the
obligations of those others, they should only help others to the degree
appropriate (even to paying taxes, or voting, or submitting suggestions to leaders). But to demand or expect that others should
follow them is prideful and perhaps even dangerous --- everyone can’t lead at
the same time; that is anarchy. And in
the chaos, someone might lose their job --- or worse.
Jesus knew there was an order to things; how many of us
(myself at the head of the list) want to lead in almost anything we take a mind
to? Whether we justify our pride by “I
know my rights,” or “I have a great idea,” or “You’re biased against me,” or
just a whiney “Why won’t you listen to me,” one of the last things we do is
look in the mirror and really see ourselves.
As a teenager who knew so much, how I now wish I could have looked in
the mirror then and saw my true self; perhaps Art would still have had a job,
and his family might have lived much better lives. Except for my pride.
I’d would liked to have had the priest stop what he was
doing this morning and say to me: “Wow!
That is a great idea!! Get with
me after mass and we’re figure out how we’ll do this thing for this great big
parish.” It would have been a déjà vu
moment: Art listening to the teenager again.
And what great disaster might await if this priest with so many souls in
his care leapt to grab the ideas of one prideful soul --- even if those ideas
might indeed be pretty good. Do you
grasp what I am saying here? It was not
for no reason that some wise man once said: “It’s hard to be humble.” It is.
But it also is hard to accept and focus on OUR obligations, FIRST. The priest IS respectful of me and is surely
interested in my ideas, but he has other obligations, bigger obligations,
FIRST. Just as I was not aware of the schedules
Art was responsible to keep, I certainly am not aware of the many obligations
of my local parish priest. And as for
the obligations of even higher ranking officials, well I am even less likely to
know or understand them ---- even if in my pride I think I do.
We were all made with talents and for a purpose. We are all in a certain place in our lives,
with certain obligations. If we are
married, with children, they are our most immediate obligations. If we are employed for a job, accomplishing
that is our immediate obligation, when we are at work. The further remote are our associations
beyond the immediate ones, the more remote our obligations. In those entities, churches, companies,
dioceses, cities, states, countries, there will be some who will have as their
immediate obligation the care of those entities; it will be THEIR work
obligation. We are to support them as
appropriate, rendering to Caesar what is Caesar’s; we are not to seek to dictate
to them or demand their allegiance to us, or our ideas. Our ideas to them are suggestions, no matter
how good they are, and they get many suggestions. It is only in pride that we believe they must
listen to us.
This is a hard thing to accept. I know. But then again, I was privileged to see up
close and first hand, the destruction my pride can accomplish. Just because I read so much, I know so much,
I think so much, does not mean I’ve read everything, I know everything, or I
can think of everything. Only pride
would make me believe that to be true.
But what, you may ask, about the “idiot boss,” or the “stupid
rule,” or the “just plain evil ruler.”
Surely we are not to just sit back and do nothing, are we? Well, perhaps you are. You know the saying “Sometimes doing nothing
is better than doing something.”
Sometimes that statement is true, in particular when you do something
with incomplete facts --- like my recommendations to Art. From all I knew I gave him great advice, but
I did not know enough, and “I did not know what I did not know.” But I thought I did. And I was wrong.
For every “idiot boss,” or “stupid rule,” or “evil ruler” who
you run across, you can and should use the talents you were blessed with, in
the manner in which you are obligated to.
You offer your boss ideas and advice; you back it with facts and data;
you enlist others to help support your thoughts (and provide additional
thoughts you might not have considered), and then you listen to your boss’s
response. If he responds without
understanding your ideas and advice, go back and develop additional clarifications
to help him understand, and if he then sees your conclusions and disagrees … shut
up. If something harmful or dangerous
might result, perhaps you might go over his head, but in general I would advise
you to shut up and get on with your other responsibilities. On this task, you have done your
responsibility; don’t let other obligations suffer because of your pride on
this one.
And if, like Art, your boss accepts your great ideas and
they fail, don’t explain that they failed because of information you didn’t
have. If you’ve done your job as you
should and considered information available to you, stop worrying. We all fail sometimes; sometimes it is our
fault, and sometimes it is not. But in
either case we should accept it and move on --- having learned some lesson
which, hopefully we will not forget in the future.
As I forgot Art.
I said a prayer for him this morning, and for
me.Sunday, October 6, 2013
Government Orders God: Stay Away!
Each week our prayer petitions at mass include prayers for
the 37 members of our small parish serving in the U.S. military, but this week
our pastor paused to give us time to PLEAD for them. As part of the government shutdown --- and
its deliberate attempts to make it noticeable and as inconvenient as possible
--- it ordered any priests or chaplains who visit military bases on Sunday to:
Stay away! Any scheduled religious
services were to be cancelled until further notice, including baptisms and
weddings.
Just when I thought I couldn’t look any further down on
those government “representatives” who fashion themselves as gods, they hit
this new low: No, we are not just AS
gods, we tell God what to do!
I dislike the tendency in our culture to be always changing
the meanings of words or coming up with new, ridiculous words, yet thinking
about our government I feel compelled to ask:
Anyone know of a word more disgusting than “disgusting?”
Monday, June 24, 2013
King of the United States
When I was growing up in Chicago we used to watch a
television show titled: Garfield Goose, King of the United States. Garfield was a hand puppet that could clap
its wooden beaks together and “talk” to the show’s human host, Frazier
Thomas. They discussed all sorts of
funny things with humor that even adults smiled at, and of course, showed lots
of cartoons. It was a very enjoyable
hour each day, but we knew it was totally a farce. Very early on we learned in school that our
forefathers sailed to America to avoid being ruled by a king, and eventually
revolted to be ruled by “the people.”
I wonder if kids are taught that nowadays, and if they think
about the implication of our forefathers’ decision.
The reason why I muse about this is because of the recent
Scripture readings at mass and in the breviary which mention Melchizedek,
priest and king of Salem, and Jesus, prophet, priest, and king. And I got to thinking about how, after God
rescued his people from Egypt, he appointed Moses and his successors to be
Judges over the people --- that is until Samuel. For in his old age Samuel was going to
appoint his sons Joel and Abijah as judges, but the people said they were
corrupt, and the people wanted “a king to govern over us … like all the nations.” God told Samuel to warn them about all the
bad things kings would do, tax and abuse them, but they still said they wanted
a king. And so God agreed, after issuing
them a final warning about the future: “In that day you will cry out because of
your king whom you have chosen for
yourselves, but the Lord will not answer you in that day.”
We usually think of kings as succeeding one another in a
family line (or at least I do), but God noted that the people “have chosen”
their king. Certainly there were kings,
victors in battle, who appointed themselves king, but there also must have been
kings chosen by the people. So a king,
therefore, is one who rules with a dictatorial power, regardless of how he came
to be in that role. It’s how he
exercises the power that defines kingship.
So, considering that our current president --- with the apparent
consent of the people --- ignores some laws of Congress and creates others by
Presidential Decree, is his ruling style any different than that of a
king? Like other kings, is he frustrated
when others don’t obey his wishes? Does
he punish them? Does he seek to punish
other kingdoms which don’t agree with him, and build alliances solely on power,
not righteousness? Do we have,
effectively, a King of the United States?
And I wonder: while he may understand his goals and desires,
does he come across to the world any clearer than Garfield Goose does clapping
his beaks together? (At least Garfield
had an interpreter for us kids.)
Is this the type of ruler the early Americans fled from; why
would we like a king now?
And would God give the people today who have chosen him any
different a warning than he gave to the people in Samuel’s day?
…. Just thoughts, on a warm Summer’s day, when there are so
many things going on which I don’t want to think about.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)